AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Intelijen buatan lan pungkasan peradaban

Negara
Language
-
Mail
Ngeculke
Nilai kritis koefisien gathukane
Distribusi normal, dening William Sefery Gosset (siswa) r = 0.0874
Distribusi normal, dening William Sefery Gosset (siswa) r = 0.0874
Distribusi Non Non, dening Spearman r = 0.0039
DistribusiOra
normal
NormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
Kabeh pitakon
Kabeh pitakon
1) Safety (sepira sampeyan setuju utawa ora setuju?)
2) Kontrol (sepira sampeyan setuju utawa ora setuju?)
1) Safety (sepira sampeyan setuju utawa ora setuju?)
Answer 1-
Positif ringkih
0.0647
Negatif lemah
-0.0402
Positif ringkih
0.1238
Negatif lemah
-0.1305
Positif ringkih
0.0097
Negatif lemah
-0.0535
Positif ringkih
0.0344
Answer 2-
Positif ringkih
0.0497
Positif ringkih
0.0373
Positif ringkih
0.0295
Negatif lemah
-0.0054
Negatif lemah
-0.0046
Negatif lemah
-0.0176
Negatif lemah
-0.0596
Answer 3-
Negatif lemah
-0.0307
Negatif lemah
-0.0330
Positif ringkih
0.0063
Positif ringkih
0.0822
Negatif lemah
-0.0127
Negatif lemah
-0.0159
Negatif lemah
-0.0149
Answer 4-
Negatif lemah
-0.0069
Positif ringkih
0.0432
Positif ringkih
0.0293
Negatif lemah
-0.0238
Negatif lemah
-0.0470
Negatif lemah
-0.0193
Positif ringkih
0.0315
Answer 5-
Positif ringkih
0.0069
Negatif lemah
-0.0237
Negatif lemah
-0.0152
Positif ringkih
0.0131
Negatif lemah
-0.0018
Positif ringkih
0.0608
Negatif lemah
-0.0308
Answer 6-
Negatif lemah
-0.0388
Negatif lemah
-0.0576
Negatif lemah
-0.1067
Positif ringkih
0.0816
Positif ringkih
0.0191
Positif ringkih
0.0491
Positif ringkih
0.0162
Answer 7-
Negatif lemah
-0.0360
Positif ringkih
0.0619
Negatif lemah
-0.0510
Negatif lemah
-0.0486
Positif ringkih
0.0403
Positif ringkih
0.0061
Positif ringkih
0.0322
2) Kontrol (sepira sampeyan setuju utawa ora setuju?)
Answer 8-
Positif ringkih
0.0254
Positif ringkih
0.0424
Positif ringkih
0.1084
Positif ringkih
0.0601
Negatif lemah
-0.0356
Negatif lemah
-0.1149
Negatif lemah
-0.0695
Answer 9-
Positif ringkih
0.0118
Negatif lemah
-0.0446
Negatif lemah
-0.0559
Positif ringkih
0.0325
Positif ringkih
0.0961
Negatif lemah
-0.0228
Negatif lemah
-0.0252
Answer 10-
Positif ringkih
0.0535
Negatif lemah
-0.0376
Negatif lemah
-0.0089
Negatif lemah
-0.0281
Negatif lemah
-0.0308
Positif ringkih
0.0262
Positif ringkih
0.0309
Answer 11-
Positif ringkih
0.0157
Positif ringkih
0.0103
Negatif lemah
-0.0089
Negatif lemah
-0.0482
Positif ringkih
0.0039
Positif ringkih
0.0010
Positif ringkih
0.0318
Answer 12-
Negatif lemah
-0.0377
Positif ringkih
0.0444
Positif ringkih
0.0304
Positif ringkih
0.0435
Negatif lemah
-0.0755
Positif ringkih
0.0475
Negatif lemah
-0.0432
Answer 13-
Negatif lemah
-0.1232
Negatif lemah
-0.0353
Negatif lemah
-0.0230
Positif ringkih
0.0330
Negatif lemah
-0.0105
Positif ringkih
0.0883
Positif ringkih
0.0191
Answer 14-
Positif ringkih
0.0124
Positif ringkih
0.0425
Negatif lemah
-0.0572
Negatif lemah
-0.1125
Positif ringkih
0.0256
Positif ringkih
0.0326
Positif ringkih
0.0763


Kaca kanggo MS Excel
Fungsi iki bakal kasedhiya ing polling VUCA dhewe
Ok



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Pemilik Produk Saas Pet Project SDTES®

Valerii layak minangka psikologi pedagoga sosial ing taun 1993 lan wiwit ngetrapake pengetahuan ing Manajemen Proyek.
Valerii entuk gelar master lan kualifikasi proyek lan manajer program ing taun 2013. Sajrone program Master dheweke, dheweke wis kenal karo Proyek Roadmap (GPM DeutscheFTFFT Für Projektmanagement E. V.) lan Dinamika Spiral.
Valerii njupuk macem-macem tes Dinamika spiral lan nggunakake kawruh lan pengalaman kanggo adaptasi versi SDTTTTTt.
Valerii minangka penulis kanggo njelajah kahanan sing durung mesthi ing V.U.C.A. Konsep nggunakake Dinamika Spiral lan statistik matematika ing Psikologi, luwih saka 20 jajak pendapat internasional.
Iki kirim duwe 0 Komentar
Wangsulan menyang
Mbatalake balesan
Ninggalake komentar sampeyan
×
YOU Golek AN ERROR
Propose versi bener
Ketik e-mail panjenengan kaya sing dikarepake
Kirim
Batal
Bot
sdtest
1
Hai ana! Ayo kula takon, apa sampeyan wis kenal karo dinamika spiral?