AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


ሰው ሰራሽ የማሰብ ችሎታ እና ስልጣኔ መጨረሻ

አገር
ቋንቋ
-
Mail
እንደገና አስቤ
የ ትሰስር የጠቋሚ የሚተቹ ዋጋ
መደበኛ ስርጭት, ዊሊያምስ በዊሊያም ጎሳዎች (ተማሪ) r = 0.0874
መደበኛ ስርጭት, ዊሊያምስ በዊሊያም ጎሳዎች (ተማሪ) r = 0.0874
መደበኛ ያልሆነ ስርጭት, በፓርቲው r = 0.0039
ስርጭትመደበኛ
ያልሆነ
መደበኛመደበኛመደበኛመደበኛመደበኛመደበኛመደበኛ
ሁሉም ጥያቄዎች
ሁሉም ጥያቄዎች
1) ደህንነት (ምን ያህል ይስማማሉ ወይም አይስማሙም?)
2) ቁጥጥር (ምን ያህል ይስማማሉ ወይም አይስማሙም?)
1) ደህንነት (ምን ያህል ይስማማሉ ወይም አይስማሙም?)
Answer 1-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0647
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0402
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.1238
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.1305
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0097
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0535
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0344
Answer 2-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0497
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0373
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0295
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0054
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0046
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0176
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0596
Answer 3-
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0307
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0330
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0063
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0822
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0127
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0159
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0149
Answer 4-
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0069
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0432
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0293
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0238
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0470
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0193
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0315
Answer 5-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0069
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0237
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0152
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0131
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0018
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0608
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0308
Answer 6-
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0388
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0576
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.1067
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0816
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0191
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0491
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0162
Answer 7-
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0360
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0619
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0510
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0486
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0403
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0061
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0322
2) ቁጥጥር (ምን ያህል ይስማማሉ ወይም አይስማሙም?)
Answer 8-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0254
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0424
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.1084
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0601
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0356
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.1149
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0695
Answer 9-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0118
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0446
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0559
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0325
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0961
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0228
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0252
Answer 10-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0535
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0376
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0089
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0281
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0308
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0262
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0309
Answer 11-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0157
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0103
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0089
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0482
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0039
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0010
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0318
Answer 12-
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0377
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0444
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0304
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0435
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0755
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0475
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0432
Answer 13-
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.1232
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0353
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0230
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0330
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0105
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0883
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0191
Answer 14-
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0124
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0425
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.0572
ደካማ አሉታዊ
-0.1125
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0256
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0326
ደካማ አዎንታዊ
0.0763


MS Excel ላክ
ይህ ተግባር በራስዎ VUCA ምርጫዎች ውስጥ ይገኛል።
እሺ



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valeri Kosenko
የምርት ባለቤት ሳባ ፔት ethret ፕሮጀክት SDTEST®

እ.ኤ.አ. በ 1993 ወደ ማህበራዊ ፔድጎግ-ሳይኮሎጂስት ብቁ ሆነች እናም በፕሮጀክት አስተዳደር ውስጥ እውቀቱን ተግባራዊ አደረጉ.
እ.ኤ.አ. በ 2013 የፕሮጀክት ዲግሪ እና የፕሮጀክቱ ሥራ አስኪያጅ በመሆን የፕሮጀክት ሥራን አግኝቷል.
Valerii የተለያዩ የችሎታ ተለዋዋጭ ምርመራዎችን ወስዶ የአሁኑን የ SDTEST ስሪቱን ለማስተካከል እውቀቱን እና ልምዱን ተጠቅሟል.
Valerii የ v.u.a.a ን እርግጠኛ አለመሆኑን የማሰስ ደራሲ ነው. ከ 20 ቱ ዓለም አቀፍ ምርጫዎች, በስነ-ልቦና የተሞላ ተለዋዋጭ ተለዋዋጭ እና የሂሳብ ስታቲስቲክስን በመጠቀም ፅንሰ-ሀሳብ.
ይህ ልጥፍ አለው 0 አስተያየቶች
መልስ ይስጡ
መልስ ሰርዝ
አስተያየትዎን ይተው
×
ይህን ስህተት ማግኘት
ትክክለኛውን VERSION ይጠቁሙ
የተፈለገውን እንደ ኢ-ሜይል ያስገቡ
ላክ
ሰርዝ
Bot
sdtest
1
ሃይ እንዴት ናችሁ! ልጠይቅህ, የክብደት ተለዋዋጭነት ያውቃሉ?