AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Intelligenza artificiale e fine della civiltà

Nazione
linguaggio
-
Mail
Ricalcolare
Valore critico del coefficiente di correlazione
Distribuzione normale, di William Sealy Gosset (Studente) r = 0.0874
Distribuzione normale, di William Sealy Gosset (Studente) r = 0.0874
Distribuzione non normale, di Spearman r = 0.0039
DistribuzioneNon
normale
NormaleNormaleNormaleNormaleNormaleNormaleNormale
Tutte le domande
Tutte le domande
1) Sicurezza (quanto sei d'accordo o in disaccordo?)
2) Controllo (quanto sei d'accordo o in disaccordo?)
1) Sicurezza (quanto sei d'accordo o in disaccordo?)
Answer 1-
Debole positivo
0.0647
Debole negativo
-0.0402
Debole positivo
0.1238
Debole negativo
-0.1305
Debole positivo
0.0097
Debole negativo
-0.0535
Debole positivo
0.0344
Answer 2-
Debole positivo
0.0497
Debole positivo
0.0373
Debole positivo
0.0295
Debole negativo
-0.0054
Debole negativo
-0.0046
Debole negativo
-0.0176
Debole negativo
-0.0596
Answer 3-
Debole negativo
-0.0307
Debole negativo
-0.0330
Debole positivo
0.0063
Debole positivo
0.0822
Debole negativo
-0.0127
Debole negativo
-0.0159
Debole negativo
-0.0149
Answer 4-
Debole negativo
-0.0069
Debole positivo
0.0432
Debole positivo
0.0293
Debole negativo
-0.0238
Debole negativo
-0.0470
Debole negativo
-0.0193
Debole positivo
0.0315
Answer 5-
Debole positivo
0.0069
Debole negativo
-0.0237
Debole negativo
-0.0152
Debole positivo
0.0131
Debole negativo
-0.0018
Debole positivo
0.0608
Debole negativo
-0.0308
Answer 5-
Debole negativo
-0.0388
Debole negativo
-0.0576
Debole negativo
-0.1067
Debole positivo
0.0816
Debole positivo
0.0191
Debole positivo
0.0491
Debole positivo
0.0162
Answer 6-
Debole negativo
-0.0360
Debole positivo
0.0619
Debole negativo
-0.0510
Debole negativo
-0.0486
Debole positivo
0.0403
Debole positivo
0.0061
Debole positivo
0.0322
2) Controllo (quanto sei d'accordo o in disaccordo?)
Answer 7-
Debole positivo
0.0254
Debole positivo
0.0424
Debole positivo
0.1084
Debole positivo
0.0601
Debole negativo
-0.0356
Debole negativo
-0.1149
Debole negativo
-0.0695
Answer 8-
Debole positivo
0.0118
Debole negativo
-0.0446
Debole negativo
-0.0559
Debole positivo
0.0325
Debole positivo
0.0961
Debole negativo
-0.0228
Debole negativo
-0.0252
Answer 9-
Debole positivo
0.0535
Debole negativo
-0.0376
Debole negativo
-0.0089
Debole negativo
-0.0281
Debole negativo
-0.0308
Debole positivo
0.0262
Debole positivo
0.0309
Answer 10-
Debole positivo
0.0157
Debole positivo
0.0103
Debole negativo
-0.0089
Debole negativo
-0.0482
Debole positivo
0.0039
Debole positivo
0.0010
Debole positivo
0.0318
Answer 11-
Debole negativo
-0.0377
Debole positivo
0.0444
Debole positivo
0.0304
Debole positivo
0.0435
Debole negativo
-0.0755
Debole positivo
0.0475
Debole negativo
-0.0432
Answer 11-
Debole negativo
-0.1232
Debole negativo
-0.0353
Debole negativo
-0.0230
Debole positivo
0.0330
Debole negativo
-0.0105
Debole positivo
0.0883
Debole positivo
0.0191
Answer 12-
Debole positivo
0.0124
Debole positivo
0.0425
Debole negativo
-0.0572
Debole negativo
-0.1125
Debole positivo
0.0256
Debole positivo
0.0326
Debole positivo
0.0763


Esporta in MS Excel
Questa funzionalità sarà disponibile nei tuoi sondaggi VUCA
Ok



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Product Owner SaaS Pet Project Sdtest®

Valerii è stato qualificato come social pedagogo-psicologo nel 1993 e da allora ha applicato le sue conoscenze nella gestione del progetto.
Valerii ha conseguito una laurea in Master e la qualifica del Progetto e del Programma nel 2013. Durante il programma del suo Master, ha acquisito familiarità con il progetto Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Projektmanagement e. V.) e Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii ha fatto vari test di dinamica a spirale e ha usato la sua conoscenza ed esperienza per adattare la versione attuale di SDTest.
Valerii è l'autore di esplorare l'incertezza del V.U.C.A. Concetto usando le dinamiche a spirale e le statistiche matematiche in psicologia, più di 20 sondaggi internazionali.
Questo post ha 0 Commenti
Rispondi a
Annulla una risposta
Lascia il tuo commento
×
Trovate un errore
PROPORRE UN versione corretta
Inserisci la tua e-mail, se lo desideri
Spedire
Annulla
Bot
sdtest
1
Ciao! Lascia che te lo chieda, hai già familiarità con le dinamiche a spirale?