AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


A.I. and the end of civilization

Country
Language
-
Mail
Recalculate
Critical value of the correlation coefficient
Normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0874
Normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0874
Non Normal distribution, by Spearman r = 0.0039
DistributionNon
Normal
NormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
All questions
All questions
1) Safety (how much do you agree or disagree?)
2) Control (how much do you agree or disagree?)
1) Safety (how much do you agree or disagree?)
Answer 1-
Weak positive
0.0647
Weak negative
-0.0402
Weak positive
0.1238
Weak negative
-0.1305
Weak positive
0.0097
Weak negative
-0.0535
Weak positive
0.0344
Answer 2-
Weak positive
0.0497
Weak positive
0.0373
Weak positive
0.0295
Weak negative
-0.0054
Weak negative
-0.0046
Weak negative
-0.0176
Weak negative
-0.0596
Answer 3-
Weak negative
-0.0307
Weak negative
-0.0330
Weak positive
0.0063
Weak positive
0.0822
Weak negative
-0.0127
Weak negative
-0.0159
Weak negative
-0.0149
Answer 4-
Weak negative
-0.0069
Weak positive
0.0432
Weak positive
0.0293
Weak negative
-0.0238
Weak negative
-0.0470
Weak negative
-0.0193
Weak positive
0.0315
Answer 5-
Weak positive
0.0069
Weak negative
-0.0237
Weak negative
-0.0152
Weak positive
0.0131
Weak negative
-0.0018
Weak positive
0.0608
Weak negative
-0.0308
Answer 6-
Weak negative
-0.0388
Weak negative
-0.0576
Weak negative
-0.1067
Weak positive
0.0816
Weak positive
0.0191
Weak positive
0.0491
Weak positive
0.0162
Answer 7-
Weak negative
-0.0360
Weak positive
0.0619
Weak negative
-0.0510
Weak negative
-0.0486
Weak positive
0.0403
Weak positive
0.0061
Weak positive
0.0322
2) Control (how much do you agree or disagree?)
Answer 8-
Weak positive
0.0254
Weak positive
0.0424
Weak positive
0.1084
Weak positive
0.0601
Weak negative
-0.0356
Weak negative
-0.1149
Weak negative
-0.0695
Answer 9-
Weak positive
0.0118
Weak negative
-0.0446
Weak negative
-0.0559
Weak positive
0.0325
Weak positive
0.0961
Weak negative
-0.0228
Weak negative
-0.0252
Answer 10-
Weak positive
0.0535
Weak negative
-0.0376
Weak negative
-0.0089
Weak negative
-0.0281
Weak negative
-0.0308
Weak positive
0.0262
Weak positive
0.0309
Answer 11-
Weak positive
0.0157
Weak positive
0.0103
Weak negative
-0.0089
Weak negative
-0.0482
Weak positive
0.0039
Weak positive
0.0010
Weak positive
0.0318
Answer 12-
Weak negative
-0.0377
Weak positive
0.0444
Weak positive
0.0304
Weak positive
0.0435
Weak negative
-0.0755
Weak positive
0.0475
Weak negative
-0.0432
Answer 13-
Weak negative
-0.1232
Weak negative
-0.0353
Weak negative
-0.0230
Weak positive
0.0330
Weak negative
-0.0105
Weak positive
0.0883
Weak positive
0.0191
Answer 14-
Weak positive
0.0124
Weak positive
0.0425
Weak negative
-0.0572
Weak negative
-0.1125
Weak positive
0.0256
Weak positive
0.0326
Weak positive
0.0763


Export to MS Excel
This functionality will be available in your own VUCA polls
Ok



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Product owner SaaS pet project SDTEST®

Valerii was qualified as a social pedagogue-psychologist in 1993 and has since applied his knowledge in project management.
Valerii obtained a Master's degree and the project and program manager qualification in 2013. During his Master's program, he became familiar with Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) and Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii took various Spiral Dynamics tests and used his knowledge and experience to adapt the current version of SDTEST.
Valerii is the author of exploring the uncertainty of the V.U.C.A. concept using Spiral Dynamics and mathematical statistics in psychology, more than 20 international polls.
This Post has 0 Comments
Reply to
Cancel a reply
Leave your comment
×
YOU FIND AN ERROR
PROPOSE YOUR CORRECT VERSION
Enter your e-mail as desired
Send
Cancel
Bot
sdtest
1
Hi there! Let me ask you, do you already familiar with Spiral Dynamics?