Dom/Blog/Future of Jobs and Generative AI

Future of Jobs and Generative AI

The advent of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT promises to transform the workplace by automating or augmenting a wide range of occupational tasks. However, a single perspective cannot fully grasp both the opportunities and risks these technologies represent across industries, workers, businesses and society. This article analyzes the World Economic Forum’s recent white paper [1] assessing the impact of LLMs on jobs through the lens of Spiral Dynamics. This integral framework reveals how different value systems perceive threats and opportunities differently. Administrative roles face disruption but efficiency gains (Blue). Innovative businesses are pressured to adopt but see new revenue potential (Orange). Vulnerable workers require support amidst job transformations (Green). Policymakers struggle to holistically analyze systemic impacts (Yellow). Realizing the benefits of LLMs requires honoring multiple worldviews, evolving processes, encouraging innovation, caring for people and conducting systems analysis. The analysis provides insights into LLMs’ multi-dimensional impacts and underscores the need for inclusive dialogue and initiatives to shape the AI-enabled future of work.

Here are the key points:

LLMs could significantly impact many jobs due to their ability to automate or augment language-based tasks, which account for an estimated 62% of work time.
The analysis assessed over 19,000 work tasks across 867 occupations to assess their LLM exposure. Tasks with high automation potential are routine and repetitive clerical/administrative tasks. Tasks with high augmentation potential require more abstract reasoning and problem-solving. Tasks with lower exposure potential emphasize interpersonal interaction.
Occupations with the highest automation potential include credit authorizers, telemarketers, statistical assistants, and tellers. Occupations with the highest augmentation potential include insurance underwriters, bioengineers, mathematicians, and editors. Occupations with lower exposure include counselors, clergy, home health aides, and lawyers.
Adopting LLMs will also likely create new roles like AI developers, content creators, interface designers, data curators, and AI ethics specialists.
The financial services and information technology industries have the overall highest potential exposure. The finance and IT functional areas also have increased exposure.
Significant alignment exists between occupations this analysis identifies as having high augmentation potential and those the Future of Jobs Report found to have high expected job growth. Similarly, occupations with high automation potential align with declining occupations.
The report concludes LLMs will transform jobs and tasks, requiring strategies by businesses and government to prepare workforces for the change through training, transition support, and social safety nets. Overall, LLMs present opportunities to raise productivity and create new jobs, if managed responsibly.

Spiral Dynamics stages

What color are you Spiral Dynamics?

Color	Beige	Purple	Red	Blue	Orange	Green	Yellow	Turquoise
In a life	Survival	Family relations	The rule of force	The power of truth	Competition	Interpersonal relations	Flexible stream	The Global vision
In a business	Own farm	Family business	Starting up a personal business	Business Process Management	Project management	Social networks	Win-Win-Win behavior	Synthesis

Here is an analysis of the World Economic Forum white paper on large language models and jobs through the lens of Spiral Dynamics stages:

Spiral Dynamics Stage	Quotes from Document
Beige	No relevant quotes
Purple	No relevant quotes
Red	No relevant quotes
Blue	"With 62% of total work time involving language-based tasks, the widespread adoption of LLMs, such as ChatGPT, could significantly impact a broad spectrum of job roles." (p.4) This reflects the blue focus on structure, process and order.
Orange	"Adopting LLMs will transform business and the nature of work, displacing some existing jobs, enhancing others and ultimately creating many new roles." (p.19) This reflects the orange drive for innovation and progress.
Green	"Governments can also partner with and support employers and educational institutions to provide training programs that prepare workers for the jobs that will grow and benefit the most from LLMs. Additionally, social safety nets and assistance in transitioning to new roles will need to be reimagined and be more precisely targeted for those most likely to be affected." (p.19) This reflects the green concern for people and relationships.
Yellow	"To assess the impact of LLMs on jobs, this paper provides an analysis of over 19,000 individual tasks across 867 occupations, assessing the potential exposure of each task to LLM adoption, classifying them as tasks that have a high potential for automation, high potential for augmentation, low potential for either or are unaffected (non-language tasks). The paper also provides an overview of new roles that are emerging due to the adoption of LLMs." (p.4) This reflects yellow's emphasis on complex systems analysis.
Turquoise	No relevant quotes

The document overall reflects blue, orange, and green worldviews, with some elements of yellow systems thinking. There are no clear expressions of the beige, purple, red or turquoise value systems. This analysis illustrates how technology impacts different aspects of society and values.

Threats

Here is an analysis of threats and affected stakeholders through the lens of Spiral Dynamics stages:

Spiral Dynamics Stage	Threats	Affected Stakeholders
Beige	No major threats identified	N/A
Purple	No major threats identified	N/A
Red	No major threats identified	N/A
Blue	Disruption of administrative processes and routines	Organizations, administrative staff
Orange	Pressure to rapidly adopt new technologies	Businesses, managers
Green	Job losses, inequality, lack of support during transition	Individual workers, marginalized groups, society
Yellow	Complexity of analyzing and managing impacts	Policy-makers, business leaders
Turquoise	No major threats identified	N/A

In summary, the blue stage is threatened by disruption of established administrative processes, the orange faces pressure to innovate, the green risks job losses and inequality, and the yellow struggles with complex systems analysis. This highlights how different worldviews perceive threats and opportunities from the same technology trend. A holistic perspective is needed to understand the range of stakeholders and design responsible policies.

Elon Musk said about the danger of artificial intelligence (A.I.) in an interview with Tucker Carlson in April 2023. Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll "A.I. and the end of civilization". The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Sztuczna inteligencja i koniec cywilizacji

Wykresy Korelacja

VUCA

Krytyczna wartość współczynnika korelacji

Dystrybucja normalna, autor: William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0874

Dystrybucja nie normalna przez Spearmana r = 0.0039

Pokaż tylko wyniki > r = 0.0874

Dystrybucja	Nie normalne	Normalna	Normalna	Normalna	Normalna	Normalna	Normalna	Normalna
Wszystkie pytania Wszystkie pytania 1) Bezpieczeństwo (ile zgadzasz się lub nie zgadzasz?) 2) Kontrola (ile zgadzasz się lub nie zgadzasz?)
1) Bezpieczeństwo (ile zgadzasz się lub nie zgadzasz?)
Answer 1	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0647	Słaby negatyw -0.0402	Słabo pozytywne 0.1238	Słaby negatyw -0.1305	Słabo pozytywne 0.0097	Słaby negatyw -0.0535	Słabo pozytywne 0.0344
Answer 2	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0497	Słabo pozytywne 0.0373	Słabo pozytywne 0.0295	Słaby negatyw -0.0054	Słaby negatyw -0.0046	Słaby negatyw -0.0176	Słaby negatyw -0.0596
Answer 3	-	Słaby negatyw -0.0307	Słaby negatyw -0.0330	Słabo pozytywne 0.0063	Słabo pozytywne 0.0822	Słaby negatyw -0.0127	Słaby negatyw -0.0159	Słaby negatyw -0.0149
Answer 4	-	Słaby negatyw -0.0069	Słabo pozytywne 0.0432	Słabo pozytywne 0.0293	Słaby negatyw -0.0238	Słaby negatyw -0.0470	Słaby negatyw -0.0193	Słabo pozytywne 0.0315
Answer 5	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0069	Słaby negatyw -0.0237	Słaby negatyw -0.0152	Słabo pozytywne 0.0131	Słaby negatyw -0.0018	Słabo pozytywne 0.0608	Słaby negatyw -0.0308
Answer 6	-	Słaby negatyw -0.0388	Słaby negatyw -0.0576	Słaby negatyw -0.1067	Słabo pozytywne 0.0816	Słabo pozytywne 0.0191	Słabo pozytywne 0.0491	Słabo pozytywne 0.0162
Answer 7	-	Słaby negatyw -0.0360	Słabo pozytywne 0.0619	Słaby negatyw -0.0510	Słaby negatyw -0.0486	Słabo pozytywne 0.0403	Słabo pozytywne 0.0061	Słabo pozytywne 0.0322
2) Kontrola (ile zgadzasz się lub nie zgadzasz?)
Answer 8	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0254	Słabo pozytywne 0.0424	Słabo pozytywne 0.1084	Słabo pozytywne 0.0601	Słaby negatyw -0.0356	Słaby negatyw -0.1149	Słaby negatyw -0.0695
Answer 9	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0118	Słaby negatyw -0.0446	Słaby negatyw -0.0559	Słabo pozytywne 0.0325	Słabo pozytywne 0.0961	Słaby negatyw -0.0228	Słaby negatyw -0.0252
Answer 10	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0535	Słaby negatyw -0.0376	Słaby negatyw -0.0089	Słaby negatyw -0.0281	Słaby negatyw -0.0308	Słabo pozytywne 0.0262	Słabo pozytywne 0.0309
Answer 11	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0157	Słabo pozytywne 0.0103	Słaby negatyw -0.0089	Słaby negatyw -0.0482	Słabo pozytywne 0.0039	Słabo pozytywne 0.0010	Słabo pozytywne 0.0318
Answer 12	-	Słaby negatyw -0.0377	Słabo pozytywne 0.0444	Słabo pozytywne 0.0304	Słabo pozytywne 0.0435	Słaby negatyw -0.0755	Słabo pozytywne 0.0475	Słaby negatyw -0.0432
Answer 13	-	Słaby negatyw -0.1232	Słaby negatyw -0.0353	Słaby negatyw -0.0230	Słabo pozytywne 0.0330	Słaby negatyw -0.0105	Słabo pozytywne 0.0883	Słabo pozytywne 0.0191
Answer 14	-	Słabo pozytywne 0.0124	Słabo pozytywne 0.0425	Słaby negatyw -0.0572	Słaby negatyw -0.1125	Słabo pozytywne 0.0256	Słabo pozytywne 0.0326	Słabo pozytywne 0.0763

Eksport do MS Excel

Ta funkcjonalność będzie dostępna we własnych ankietach VUCA

You can not only just create your poll in the Taryfa «V.U.C.A poll projektant» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the Taryfa «Sklep z ankietą», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing Taryfa «My SDT»

Opportunities

Here is an analysis of opportunities and affected stakeholders through the lens of Spiral Dynamics stages:

Spiral Dynamics Stage	Opportunities	Affected Stakeholders
Beige	No major opportunities identified	N/A
Purple	No major opportunities identified	N/A
Red	No major opportunities identified	N/A
Blue	Increased efficiency of administrative processes	Organizations, administrative staff
Orange	Creation of new business models and revenue streams	Businesses, entrepreneurs
Green	Upskilling workers, maintaining an inclusive workforce	Individual workers, marginalized groups, society
Yellow	Holistic analysis of technology's impact on work	Policy-makers, business leaders
Turquoise	No major opportunities identified	N/A

In summary, blue sees opportunities for improved efficiency, orange in innovation and profit, green in supporting workers, and yellow in systems analysis. This highlights how different worldviews perceive opportunities from the same technology trend. An integral perspective is required to balance opportunities for organizations and individuals.

GAP Analysis

Here is a GAP analysis from a Spiral Dynamics perspective:

Spiral Dynamics Stage	GAP Analysis
Beige	No major gap identified
Purple	No major gap identified
Red	No major gap identified
Blue	GAP: Lacks discussion of how to evolve administrative processes rather than just making existing ones more efficient
Orange	GAP: Could provide more examples of how new business models and industries could arise from LLMs
Green	GAP: More detail is needed on programs to support workers through transitions and ensure opportunities are inclusive
Yellow	GAP: Deeper analysis required on technological impacts across education, business, and government domains
Turquoise	GAP: Holistic vision absent - how could LLMs improve society and actualization beyond business impacts?

In summary, blue could be used more on process evolution, orange on business model innovation, green on worker support, yellow on cross-domain impacts, and turquoise on realizing higher human potential. This reflects common gaps faced when new technologies are viewed primarily through one worldview lens rather than holistically. An integral perspective is needed to fully understand impacts and opportunities.

Overcome Gaps

Here are some suggested measures to overcome the gaps through the lens of Spiral Dynamics perspective:

Spiral Dynamics Stage	Suggested Measures to Overcome GAPs
Beige	N/A
Purple	N/A
Red	N/A
Blue	Conduct process redesign workshops to evolve administrative workflows
Orange	Research case studies and build scenarios describing new LLMs-enabled business models
Green	Profile reskilling programs and multi-stakeholder partnerships to support workers
Yellow	Model impacts of LLMs on education, healthcare, government, and other complex systems
Turquoise	Envision how LLMs could advance human potential and consciousness evolution

In summary, suggested measures include:

Blue: Process redesign workshops
Orange: New business model research
Green: Reskilling program profiles
Yellow: Modelling systemic impacts
Turquoise: Envisioning advancing human potential

This highlights the value of taking a holistic perspective and utilizing tools and ways of thinking from multiple stages and worldviews to fully understand and act upon the opportunities presented by emerging technologies like large language models.

Conclusion

The Spiral Dynamics framework reveals that the opportunities and threats presented by large language models are perceived differently across value systems. Blue sees potential efficiency gains but disruption of administrative routines. Orange focuses on innovation possibilities but feels pressured to rapidly adopt. Green emphasizes supporting impacted workers but risks exacerbating inequalities. Yellow provides systems analysis but grapples with complexity.

Fully realizing the benefits of large language models in the workplace and society requires transcending any worldview. An integral approach that honors multiple perspectives is needed. This includes evolving processes, encouraging innovation, caring for people, and systemic analysis. Further, a holistic vision looks beyond business impacts to how emerging technologies can advance human potential and social actualization.

By understanding these different value perspectives, businesses, policymakers, and workers can collaboratively shape the future of work in the age of artificial intelligence. A shared vision arises when stakeholders cooperate across stages of psychological and social development. This white paper provides insights into the multi-dimensional impacts of large language models across industries, occupations, and societal roles. Yet more inclusive dialogue and initiatives are needed to proactively guide this technology for the benefit of all.

[1] https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Jobs_of_Tomorrow_Generative_AI_2023.pdf

2023.10.12

Valerii Kosenko

Właściciel produktu Saas Pet Project Sdtest®

Valerii został zakwalifikowany jako pedagog społeczny w 1993 roku i od tego czasu zastosował swoją wiedzę w zakresie zarządzania projektami.
Valerii uzyskał tytuł magistra oraz kwalifikacje Project and Program Manager w 2013 roku. Podczas swojego programu magisterskiego zapoznał się z projektem Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft Für ProjektManagement E. V.) i Dynamics Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii wziął różne testy dynamiki spiralnej i wykorzystał swoją wiedzę i doświadczenie, aby dostosować obecną wersję SDTest.
Valerii jest autorem eksploracji niepewności V.U.C.A. Koncepcja wykorzystująca spiralną dynamikę i statystyki matematyczne w psychologii, ponad 20 międzynarodowych sondaży.

Ten post ma 0 Uwagi

Odpowiedzieć do

Anuluj odpowiedź

Zostaw swój komentarz